<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>French Cafe &#187; 1930s</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ot-maurice.com/tag/1930s/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ot-maurice.com</link>
	<description>Your Connection To Everything French</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:47:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>International Arbitration, The Pacific Settlement of Disputes and the French Security-Disarmament Dilemma (1919-1931)</title>
		<link>http://www.ot-maurice.com/international-arbitration-the-pacific-settlement-of-disputes-and-the-french-security-disarmament-dilemma-1919-1931/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ot-maurice.com/international-arbitration-the-pacific-settlement-of-disputes-and-the-french-security-disarmament-dilemma-1919-1931/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 21:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[French History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1930s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aggression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bilaterally]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commitments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Concrete Measures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Confidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dilemma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Driven Initiative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Favour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First World War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goodwill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Arbitration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Disarmament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Disputes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military Assistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Settlement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Post War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Movement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ot-maurice.com/international-arbitration-the-pacific-settlement-of-disputes-and-the-french-security-disarmament-dilemma-1919-1931/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[International arbitration played an ambiguous role in French planning over national security during the years following the First World War, as policymakers faced the challenge of dealing with the powerful post-war movement in favour of international disarmament. It was a French-driven initiative in 1924 that accorded arbitration a central role as a means to ensure [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>International arbitration played an ambiguous role in French planning over national security during the years following the First World War, as policymakers faced the challenge of dealing with the powerful post-war movement in favour of international disarmament. It was a French-driven initiative in 1924 that accorded arbitration a central role as a means to ensure the pacific settlement of international disputes, yet policymakers in Paris remained for the most part convinced that arbitration on its own could never be certain enough to safeguard France. Though they would continue to support the cause of arbitration into the early 1930s, as a means to expand the powers available to the League Council, they rejected the idea that disarmament could follow from a mere increase of confidence or an ethos of goodwill. Disarmament could only follow from concrete measures to underpin security, namely commitments of military assistance against unprovoked aggression. These could be organized through the League or bilaterally, but they could not be substituted for by arbitration.</p>
<p>    <a href="http://fh.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/24/2/236?rss=1">Read More</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ot-maurice.com/international-arbitration-the-pacific-settlement-of-disputes-and-the-french-security-disarmament-dilemma-1919-1931/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A La Recherche D&#8217;Une Guerre Gagnee: The Ligue Des Droits De L&#8217;Homme and the War Guilt Question (1918-1922)</title>
		<link>http://www.ot-maurice.com/a-la-recherche-dune-guerre-gagnee-the-ligue-des-droits-de-lhomme-and-the-war-guilt-question-1918-1922/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ot-maurice.com/a-la-recherche-dune-guerre-gagnee-the-ligue-des-droits-de-lhomme-and-the-war-guilt-question-1918-1922/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 21:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[French History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1918]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1930s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bona Fides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crusade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Droits De L Homme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First World War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Imputation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ligue Des Droits De L Homme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parameters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Position]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Purity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rsquo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Guilt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Period]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ot-maurice.com/a-la-recherche-dune-guerre-gagnee-the-ligue-des-droits-de-lhomme-and-the-war-guilt-question-1918-1922/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Initially conceived as an organization dedicated to the defence of human rights on an individual scale, during the Great War the Ligue des droits de l&#8217;homme took the avowedly political position of supporting the Union sacr&#233;e. The bona fides of France&#8217;s crusade against Germany was vigorously contested by a minority within the Ligue, however, which [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Initially conceived as an organization dedicated to the defence of human rights on an individual scale, during the Great War the Ligue des droits de l&rsquo;homme took the avowedly political position of supporting the Union sacr&eacute;e. The bona fides of France&#8217;s crusade against Germany was vigorously contested by a minority within the Ligue, however, which not only rejected the imputation of unique war guilt to Germany after the war but also questioned the purity of French motives, especially in the light of France&#8217;s 1894 alliance with Russia. The immediate post-First World War period set the parameters of a debate that would destroy the Ligue in the 1930s.</p>
<p>    <a href="http://fh.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/24/2/218?rss=1">Read More</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ot-maurice.com/a-la-recherche-dune-guerre-gagnee-the-ligue-des-droits-de-lhomme-and-the-war-guilt-question-1918-1922/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

